Rashid Askari
Almost four
decades have passed since we won the victory in our Liberation War
(1971). But still we could not have the sweet smell of its success to
the fullest. What we were supposed to gain from this victory has not yet
rightly come down to us. This is precisely because of the lack of
careful nurturing of our Liberation War ideals, which has once again
proved that to earn independence is tough, but to nourish it is tougher.
It is getting far tougher for the constant obstruction of the
anti-liberation and pseudo- liberation elements in the society.
They are
always working against the true liberation stream, and at times
becoming highly vocal in the criticism of the most sensitive national
and historical issues like our Liberation War. They court controversy
over the proven facts of our national history. Recently some of the
anti-liberation eggheads hit the headline by putting a highly
controversial gloss on a settled historical matter. They tried to dub
our Liberation War as an 'Indo-Pak War'. They have strong aversion to
calling it 'Bangladesh War of Independence.'
The bottom-line of their brainchild is that
Bangladesh fought no Liberation War. It achieved liberation through the
Independence struggle, not through any war. The war that occurred in
1971 was between Pakistan and India. This sort of slanderous remarks
cannot be sidestepped as mere a slip of the tongue. They must have a
far-reaching cause at the back of their mind. They have exploded the
idea at such a time when the war criminals are standing trial, and the
whole nation is supporting it except for a few of their blind followers,
political allies, and beneficiaries. Even many of their young folks
are not willing to retain their old leaders' Independence legacy smeared
with the innocent blood of their fellow countrymen.
So, while the fundamentalist politics is going
through a sticky patch, and the marked war criminals are awaiting
punishment in custody, their hired men are trying to clutch at straws by
manufacturing weird ideas with a view to fishing in the troubled
waters. Their motive is to pass the buck to others. They are trying to
establish that there was no war between Bangladesh and Pakistan, and
hence there should be no question of the existence of war criminals in
Bangladesh. They are pointing their accusing finger at the Pakistani
occupation army and asking to bring them to justice, which is not
possible at this moment on the part of the Government. The Government,
however, is trying to try the criminals of the country who were involved
in killing, plundering, arson, rape, molestation, and such other crimes
against humanity during the Liberation War with the backing of the
Pakistani occupation army. They are, too, war criminals for aiding and
abetting the war criminals, and in one sense more criminal than their
Pakistani masters. The occupation army could not have carried on the
massacre by themselves, if their local accomplices had not assisted
them.
Their arguments are, however, feeble, flimsy,
lame, and ludicrous. Stuff and nonsense! They do not know what they are
talking about. They do not know the difference between the Independence
struggle and the Independence War. There are a hundred and one ways to
blow their claim out of the water.
Our Independence struggle covers the entire
gamut of the mass uprising ranging from the Language Movement of 1952 to
the Liberation War of 1971, while the Liberation War is the nine-month
long armed combat between the Pakistani occupation army and the
Bangladeshi freedom fighters. Our dearly bought Independence is the
immediate upshot of the Liberation War and the end result of the
long-borne mass movement from language to liberty. And the fact that we
have earned our Independence by fighting a bloody battle is absolutely
self-evident.
So, to ignore the Liberation War is to reject
the glorious gallantry of the people. It was a well organized and
corporate combat shared by peoples from all walks of life. The military
and civil forces stood hand in hand and shoulder to shoulder, and fought
the war against their national enemies. The Liberation War took place
in two phases. The first phase was the war of resistance, which began
just after the Operation Searchlight was unleashed on the deadly night
of 25 March, 1971. The moment the marauding Pakistani army waged the
crackdown on the sleeping people at dead of night, some of our armed
forces started fighting back almost instantaneously. Charged by
Bangabandhu with the responsibility of making every house a fort and
remaining prepared to fight the enemies with whatever they havethe
freedom-mad people of Bangladesh did not hesitate to jump into
counter-attacks. This war of resistance continued until the Mujibnagar
Government was formed on 17 April, 1971.
The second phase of our Liberation War started
formally under the auspices of the Mujibnagar Government in an organized
way. The whole country was divided into eleven sectors under the
command of eleven highly efficient army officers. Apart from that, many
civil commanders formed different guerilla forces to fight the enemies.
The valiant military and the civil freedom fighters of Bangladesh forged
ahead so indomitably that the highly trained Pakistani armed forces
were kept at bay. They had no choice but to surrender.
Although the war lasted only nine months, it
took a heavy toll on human life and honour. It wreaked havoc on the
entire country. As many as three million people were killed, and two
hundred thousand women were raped and molested. Numberless houses,
buildings, mills, factories, bridges, culverts, roads, highways, and
railways were destroyed. If all these do not become a war, then what
else is it?
The reactionary minds always look at the
Liberation- matters from their own vantage point as successors to the
defeated forces in the Liberation War. Sometimes they consider it as a
'civil war' waged against the solidarity of Pakistan at the instigation
of India, and sometimes as an 'Indo-Pak war'. They regard Mujib as
'India's agent' who agitated for breaking their 'holy' Pakistan. This
was, however, the view of the Pakistani rulers too, about our
Independence Movement and its greatest leader. Jamaat-e-Islami shared
the same view, and aided and abetted them in the war, but to no avail.
Victory was in favour of the mass people. The collaborators could not
put up with their defeat nor could they stomach people's victory in the
war. So, they tried and are still trying to avenge upon the
pro-liberation peoples and their ideals. It is no wonder that they will
try to twist the actual facts of our Liberation War as long as they
can. About four decades after the Liberation War, they have not yet
changed their views let alone seeking people's pardon for their
ignominious role in the war. They are still harping on the same old
thing with the Goebbelian hope that some day people would believe them.
They are, perhaps, ignorant of the fact that all people can be fooled
for some time or some people for all time, but all people cannot be
fooled for all the time.
India joined the Bangladesh Liberation War just
a few days before the final victory. This has prompted the detractors'
fertile imagination to call it an Indo-Pak war. If this wild imagination
is not kept in fetters, they will go on to spin more yarns about it.
And you never can tell, one fine morning they would come up with another
queer theory that the Liberation War was a 'US-Soviet' war, because in
the same war, America sided with Pakistan and Soviet Russia with
Bangladesh giving huge military support and diplomatic assurances. When
America sent a nuclear-armed aircraft carrier of their Pacific Fleet to
the Bay of Bengal to support Pakistan, Russia sent their Fleet to the
Andaman (Indian Ocean) to support Bangladesh and India. But the war
ended before any such assistance could be rendered. However, the
'inventive' anti-liberation minds can find ample chances of labeling the
war a 'US-Soviet' War. If they can justify a claim like this, the list
of the war criminals would be lengthened, and the trial of the
Bangladeshi war criminals may be shelved for another four decades. And
the accused ones can continue to be safe from the purview of the War
Crime Tribunal.
The slanderers also throw into question
Pakistan's surrender to the Indian military representative. This is also
a flimsy logic. The Pakistani armed forces in Bangladesh surrendered to
Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Arora as per military hierarchy. He was
the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Indian and Bangladeshi
forces in the Eastern Theatre. This does not necessarily mean that it
was a war between India and Pakistan. It is rather the norm of the war.
In fact, India joined the war after Pakistan attacked eight air fields
in northwest India, otherwise India might not have participated in the
war.The guerilla force called Muktibahini and the newly formed
Bangladesh Army had already been fighting the Pakistani forces for about
eight months prior to the arrival of the Indian army. So, there is no
reason as to why it can be called an Indo-Pak war!
But, these squabbling and backbiting-episodes
are no laughing matter. This sort of things should not go unchallenged.
This is a treasonable offence. Law should not be broken with impunity
especially with regard to such sensitive national issues. The defamers
are enjoying all the facilities the state can offer, but refusing to
recognize its independence, its sovereignty, and even its glorious
birth. They are really the limit! There should be no scope for evasion
of their responsibility.
............................................................
Dr. Rashid Askari writes fiction and columns, and teaches English
literature at Kushtia Islamic University. E-mail:
rashidaskari65@yahoo.com
Source: http://www.thedailystar.net/suppliments/2010/12/victory_day/facts.html
Reach Rashdi Askari's FanClub in FaceBook at http://www.facebook.com/groups/mamoonaskari/
No comments:
Post a Comment