Rashid Askari
Published in the Daily Star Suppliments, 21st February 2012/page7
Bangla
reached international heights for the first time at the hands of
Rabindranath Tagore when he won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1913.
That a poet from a far-off land was awarded the world's most prestigious
literary accolade brought his language into global focus. For the
second time Bangla caught the attention of the world in the year 1952
when Bengali people's love of their language gave rise to a historic
movement.
Bangla gains a permanent position of dignity when it was
declared the state language of new-born Bangladesh by its constitution.
The proud and independent people of Bangladesh valued it so highly that
their leader Sheikh Mujib addressed the UN General Assembly in Bangla
in 1974. In the course of events, the Bangalee's 'Mother Language Day'
(21st February) was declared the 'International Mother Language Day' in
1999 by UNESCO in commemoration of the historic Language Movement of
1952. With all these achievements, the people of Bangladesh feel very
enthusiastic about seeing their beloved mother tongue much further from
the present position.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has
thrice proposed in the UN General Assembly that Bangla be one of its
official languages. She put forward the proposal during her address to
its 64th Session. She argued that Bengali as a language holds a
"singular place as a symbol of people's faith in the power of languages
to sustain cultures, and indeed the identity of nations". The Parliament
led by her passed a resolution in 2009 endorsing her claim following
which the Indian State of West Bengal also passed a similar resolution
in its parliament. Apart from these governmental efforts, many private/
personal measures are also being taken in support of this popular cause.
But the United Nation has so far
shown no sign of cognizance of the importance of the case. Why the UN is
so indifferent to this enormous public demand is not very clear. It is
not as if they have set the seal on the process of inclusion of any more
official language(s). As a matter of fact, there is no hard and fast
rule as such about the inclusion of languages in the UN. The UN Charter,
in its 1945 constituent document, did not categorically provide for any
official languages. The Charter was, however, passed in five languages
(Chinese, French, Russian, English, and Spanish). In 1946, the first
session of the UN General Assembly adopted the above-mentioned five
languages as official and two languages (English and French) as working
languages. The second session of the General Assembly (1947) adopted
permanent rules of procedure relating to UN languages in conformity with
the 1946 rules, but with an exception to their application. The 1947
rules did apply only to the General Assembly, not to other UN organs.
The proposal to add Spanish as a
third working language was passed on 11 December 1948. Again in 1968,
Russian, and in 1973 Chinese were added as the working languages of the
General Assembly. Arabic was made both an official and a working
language of the GA in the same year (1973). Thus all six official
languages were also made working languages of the GA.
The six official languages(
Chinese, French, Russian, English, Spanish and Arabic) used in the UN
are spoken either as mother tongue or second language by 2.8 billion
people in the world who are less than half of the world population( the
world population now is 7 billion). So the UN cannot equally represent
the interest of the speakers of the rest of the languages. Language is
not merely a means of communication in a people, it also represents
their beliefs and disbeliefs, hopes and aspirations, culture and
society. So the non-inclusion of other major languages of the world may
amount to a disregard of the majority of people. Being the largest human
organization, the UN should not indulge in it. It should rather give
all the major languages room for global recognition.
In addition, to include a
language as an official or a working language of the UN is not as
difficult as the inclusion of the members of its security council where
the tug of war is very intense. One may clinch the deal based on the
simple logic that the UN is the world biggest association of the people,
so the language spoken by a larger population should be accepted as one
of its official languages.
A number of languages like
Portuguese, German, Italian, Japanese, Hindi and Urdu are waiting in
eager anticipation of being included in the UN official language list.
The respective countries are strongly laying their claim to it.
Bangladesh has recently appeared on the scene. Could she be able to
outdistance her major rivals for this selection?
Although it is hard to come by, it
is not impossible. It is not always the military might that matters.
Ban Ki-moon was not selected as the UN Sectary General on the basis of
his country's martial power. The UN has internationalized our 'Mother
Language Day' recognizing the sacrifice of lives made by Bangladeshis
for the right to language. The reason why they have dignified the
'Bengali Language Movement' should apply to the case of selecting the
historic language as one of its official languages.
For the above reasons, the
proposal for making Bangla a UN language has found favour with the
people of Bangladesh. But we are not ultra-nationalistic. We do not want
to upset the apple cart of others. We want more languages to be the
official language of the UN including our Bangla. It is the sixth
largest language of the world in terms of native speakers. As many as
300 million people across the world speak the language. The number is
far larger than that of the French speakers, and nearly equal to that of
the Arabic speakers. So it has got every right to be selected as one of
the UN official languages. The UN can easily increase the number of its
languages by taking one or more from among the languages of the
claiming countries. Where's the harm in that???
Dr. Rashid Askari writes fiction and
columns, and teaches English literature at Kushtia Islamic University,
Bangladesh. Email: rashidaskari65@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment